libdl in static build

Rogelio Serrano rogelio.serrano at
Sun Sep 10 10:30:33 UTC 2006

On 9/10/06, Mike Frysinger <vapier at> wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2006 04:48, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > is it possible to use libdl when uclibc is built without shared lib
> > support?
> in theory yes
> has any one actually tried ?  i dont think so

it does not work. libdl.a is not built. what i did was build shared
uclibc then deleted the shared libs.

the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items

More information about the uClibc mailing list