uClibc patches for sh-2

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 23 October 2006 03:10, Paul Mundt wrote:
> No, userspace soft-float is still the way to go, just no one has written
> up the patch for it yet.

ah ok, i thought i was going crazy for a second there :)

> On the other hand, hardfloat emulation gives us 
> some better ABI consistency between SH-3 and SH-4. Since these binaries
> would hit an illegal instruction otherwise, we're not really "losing"
> anything by trapping them and fixing them up, even if the performance
> is sub-optimal.

sure ... develop with hard float turned off, but keeping the emulation in the 
final product is always a sane thing ... i'd rather have a product that ran a 
little bit slower every once in a while than crashed ...
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20061023/b494f059/attachment-0002.pgp