sscanf in uClibc vs glibc

Mike Frysinger vapier at
Fri Nov 17 11:24:05 UTC 2006

On Friday 17 November 2006 05:10, Thomas Lundquist wrote:
> a collegue has a problem with sscanf (he needs it to support integers
> and strings) and it works on a glibc Linux machine but not our buildroot
> based (with 0.9.28) arm target.

be more specific ... as in, post the actual code he's trying to get to work

there are some things/behaviors glibc supports that uclibc purposefully does 
not ... uClibc conforms to POSIX's definition of sscanf and not to glibc's 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the uClibc mailing list