Long release cycle (was: RE: uclibc tool chain installation problem)

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Thu Mar 23 00:02:17 UTC 2006


On Wed Mar 22, 2006 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:26, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > we should have gcc and binutils patches in shape prior to the
> > .29 release.
> 
> there shouldnt be any trouble with binutils ... especially
> 2.16.91.0.7; pretty much everything we patch now are libtool
> files :)

Any reason you can think of then why we should keep supporting
other binutils versions?  Perhaps it is time to cull the older
binutils releases from the mix.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list