Long release cycle (was: RE: uclibc tool chain installation problem)
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Thu Mar 23 00:02:17 UTC 2006
On Wed Mar 22, 2006 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:26, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > we should have gcc and binutils patches in shape prior to the
> > .29 release.
>
> there shouldnt be any trouble with binutils ... especially
> 2.16.91.0.7; pretty much everything we patch now are libtool
> files :)
Any reason you can think of then why we should keep supporting
other binutils versions? Perhaps it is time to cull the older
binutils releases from the mix.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list