gtk+ 2.6 and Buildroot

[Sean Kelley]

For those who have the resources in the design, is there not an option
in Buildroot to choose GLIBC instead of UCLIBC?

Sean

On 3/5/06, Aurelien Jacobs <aurel at gnuage.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 13:03:56 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 05 March 2006 11:26, Sean Kelley wrote:
> > > Has anyone built gtk+ 2.6 along with its dependencies with Buildroot?
> > > If so do you have an example mk file for Buildroot?
> >
> > gtk+2 requires glib-2 which requires iconv which doesnt work very well at all
> > in uClibc ... so it may be a lost cause unless iconv is fixed up in uClibc
>
> I didn't tested it, but I guess he could use the GNU libiconv instead of
> trying to use uClibc (partial/broken) internal implementation.
>
>   http://www.gnu.org/software/libiconv/
>
> The BSD iconv might be another solution.
>
> Aurel
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>