inotify patch

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:10, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> I was asking a valid question about if anyone was seeing
> how the size of uClibc was changing from release to release.

no, your question was pointed at implying no one cared about the size as we 
add more features

the solution to the growing size isnt to simply cut features, but to figure 
out how to control what is built into uClibc
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20060620/549c99ae/attachment-0002.pgp