[gmail] Re: Altera Nios2 troubles

[Cristiano Ghirardi]

Thanks for the info. I agree, we have had the same impression: it's not
impossible
to get the Nios2 working with uClinux (mainly thanks to your help) but it's
somewhat
tricky and "dirty". Still worse is the Altera attitude about uClinux.
OK now we have something tho think about....
Thank you again


On 7/18/06, Marc Leeman <marc.leeman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > worried about this solution: the problem seems the Altera attitude
> > vs the uClinux community. Better: we can't understand if none is using
> > uClinux on Nios2 because the Altera attitude or because none thinks
> > that is a good solution and so the Altera is not supporting it.  Now we
> > have the impression that if we start a project we have to develop it
> > (also the O.S.) without any help and for us is a big risk. Do you have
> > had the same impression?
>
> I've been working on Nios II about a year ago. The problem is that the
> software to program the FPGAs on with Linux from Altera (Quartus) works
> if you're lucky but might break with any new release and/or service
> pack. If you don't plan on running 32-bit x86, you're in even more
> problems.
>
> Anyway, you can get this working under Linux.
>
> The problem is, and this is my experience, that Altera basically does
> not care about uCLinux as a kernel (they try to push OS/II, their
> kernel); however they do use and provide the gcc sources.
>
> With some patching and quite some cleanup; you should be able to get a
> nice toolchain starting from that (and compile it yourself). I submitted
> a patch to buildroot last year; and some ppl on niosforum picked it up
> and improved it.
>
> As for the embedded Linux kernel, that has been "outsourced" to
> Microtronix. This company; as some embedded Linux vendors tend to do;
> release their code in a tarball. Again you'll need to do some cleanup
> and try to split off the changes in a number of functionality patches.
>
> Obviously, there is no toolchain and development package available to
> my knowledge for creating a decent rootfs that runs under Linux. Some
> posts seem to indicate that they are available internally; but they have
> not been released to the public.
>
> Again, with some work; you'll be able to pull this off; and a number of
> ppl have done this.
>
> From a research point of view (and having worked at a university for
> some years); I could appreciate this since there is really _a lot of
> room_ for improvement :) There is no real reason why you should not get
> everything working properly :) There are quite some ppl on niosforum.com
> that are helpful.
>
> On the other hand; from a commercial point of view; you might be a lot
> better off adding a low cost PowerPC processor next to your FPGA which
> has a lot better community support. The price you need for the hardware
> solution and peripherals is likely to be compensated by the lower FPGA
> cost and lower development time and better stability; esp. if you consider
> that Nios2 has no MMU.
>
> In my dealings with Altera about this; they have politely listened to my
> concerns, have written them down and have probably burried them since I
> haven't heard of them since (even though we did try to push the changes
> and improvements out).
>
> We now add a low cost PowerPC core on our designs and skip Nios II
> completely for interfacing and control (in fact, IIRC, it is even
> recommended by some ppl @Altera to go this way instead of the Nios II
> solution).
>
> --
>   greetz, marc
> God, I love science fiction.
>         Crichton - Revenging Angel
> scorpius.homelinux.org 2.6.17 #2 PREEMPT Thu Jun 22 07:18:33 CEST 2006
> GNU/Linux
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFEvMgGUQpj09NWLeERAp6OAJ0Zmu+A21iwYS5b3/VdYUqB6aLflACfXHa/
> A50TpeTvQWcxCtcXvXB9r2o=
> =YhEN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>


-- 
-- Cristiano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20060718/ac5d5ee5/attachment-0001.htm