Arm SA_ONSTACK vs. unwinding
Paul Brook
paul at codesourcery.com
Wed Jul 5 15:09:31 UTC 2006
The comment in arm/sigaction.c says SA_ONSTACK isn't defined by X/Open. This
seems bogus. Both current glibc and XSI[1] say otherwise.
The attached patch removes the special SA_ONSTACK handling, and adds unwinding
information to __default_sa_restorer. Both of these are based on the glibc
code.
This most common use of this is NPTL thread cancellation. However it is useful
in its own right so I'm submitting the patch for trunk.
Paul
[1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/signal.h.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.sa_onstack
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2971 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20060705/9a377ce0/attachment.bin
More information about the uClibc
mailing list