More on the armv4l segfault.
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Sat Dec 30 04:43:43 UTC 2006
On Thursday 28 December 2006 6:30 pm, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Rob, found this link that might explain your problem:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00107.html
Ah, cool.
So my problem is that if there are _no_ non-weak references to a symbol, the
linker won't pull that symbol in at all?
That kind of sucks, but also explains why my patch worked. Any suggestions of
a better way to fix this in uClibc?
> Jocke
Rob
--
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
More information about the uClibc
mailing list