__cxa_atexit and __cxa_finalize implementation
Peter S. Mazinger
ps.m at gmx.net
Fri Sep 16 17:25:39 UTC 2005
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > __libc_stack_end can be added too, but I wonder why glibc does not need
> > > > it?
> > >
> > > Perhaps because they have had __libc_stack_end for a long time already?
> >
> > is __libc_stack_end=NULL; enough?
>
> Probably, not sure since I don't known your exact problem.
I dont have any (regarding this), but I know at least 2 cases where either
update or new build from glibc failed due to missing __libc_stack_end.
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
More information about the uClibc
mailing list