__cxa_atexit and __cxa_finalize implementation

Peter S. Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Fri Sep 16 17:25:39 UTC 2005


On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

> > > > __libc_stack_end can be added too, but I wonder why glibc does not need
> > > > it?
> > >
> > > Perhaps because they have had __libc_stack_end for a long time already?
> > 
> > is __libc_stack_end=NULL; enough?
> 
> Probably, not sure since I don't known your exact problem.

I dont have any (regarding this), but I know at least 2 cases where either 
update or new build from glibc failed due to missing __libc_stack_end.

Peter

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2




More information about the uClibc mailing list