was: begin using attribute_hidden

Peter S. Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Sun Nov 13 16:34:42 UTC 2005


On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

> > Or we go w/ strong_alias for all ANSI/ISO or SuSv3, the 
> > others weak_alias?
> > What should be really overridable by an app, only glibc extensions?
> > 
> > glibc cares about backward compatibility that we do not have 
> > to consider.
> 
> I think we should use strong_alias until we find it doesn't work for some reason. 
> I guess glibc uses weak so you can several defs of the same function and let the linker
> select which one to use, but I am only guessing here.

we won't have this issue, because we only build one object depending on 
build options (arch-optimized, if not present then generic-optimized, 
if not present then generic)

Peter

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2




More information about the uClibc mailing list