[uClibc] [RFC] RUNPATH config option for ld.so

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Sun Jun 26 17:55:41 UTC 2005


On Sunday 26 June 2005 07:08 am, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 June 2005 05:26 am, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 25 June 2005 03:28 am, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > > > > On Sat Jun 25, 2005 at 02:22:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > > +config LDSO_RUNPATH_FULL
> > > > > > +	bool "FULL"
> > > > > > +	help
> > > > > > +	  Respect all RUNPATH's regardless (same behavior as glibc).
> > > > > > +config LDSO_RUNPATH_SAFE
> > > > > > +	bool "SAFE"
> > > > > > +	help
> > > > > > +	  Only respect RUNPATH's which contain absolute paths.
> > > > > > +config LDSO_RUNPATH_NONE
> > > > > > +	bool "NONE"
> > > > > > +	help
> > > > > > +	  Disable RUNPATH support all together.
> > > > > > +endchoice
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, I think this is too many choices for no real benefit....
> > > > > IMHO it should be all or nothing.
> > > >
> > > > i offered one more option ('safe') than you guys wanted ... the back
> > > > end is trivial to support this, it'd require one ifdef around a path
> > > > check ...
> > >
> > > show us please.
> >
> > attached
>
> This also does the same to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

inttended side effect ... wrapper scripts often do things like 'export 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:blahblah' which, much more often than not, 
evaluate to ":blahblah" ...
-mike



More information about the uClibc mailing list