[uClibc] Re: implementing __libc_stack_end

Gustavo Guillermo Pérez gustavo at compunauta.com
Thu Jun 23 17:30:16 UTC 2005

El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 11:52, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:15 am, Gustavo Guillermo Pérez wrote:
> > El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 09:18, Peter S. Mazinger escribió:
> > > [...]
> > > kaffe does use explicitely __libc_stack_end if GLIBC is defined (and
> > > uClibc defines that too). You need a patch mentioned on ml some time to
> > > build kaffe against uClibc.
> >
> > Yes I was post that patch :(
> > But I never understand exactly who defines who
> uclibc fakes out the glibc define because a lot of packages will check for
> it and do ugly stuff if it isnt defined
> since uclibc is a drop in replacment of glibc, most of the time it's ok
> (and desirable) to fake the define
> -mike
Ahhh, ok that's because the ugly stuff goes in action, then IS ok for that 
patch because the autor of the garbage collector seems to know some archs may 
be doesn't support __libc_stack_end and the ugly stuff seems to work better 
than using __libc_stack_end
Gustavo Guillermo Pérez
Compunauta uLinux

More information about the uClibc mailing list