[uClibc] rsh server
maryam_seraj at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 8 16:23:41 UTC 2005
Thank you all for your suggestions.
The reason why I have to go with rsh is because
it's non-interactive. There are quite a few
scripts on the control plane which rsh into the
data plane to execute a few things. Since I upgraded
the kernel/busybox versions on the data plane,
therefore, I need to comply with the way it used
to be done before, hence having to have a rsh
--- Marc Leeman <marc.leeman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Isn't rsh itself one big vulnerability?!
> cleartext passwords and all
> > that?
> Just install dropbear (embedded ssh) and you'll get
> all the
> functionality that goes with ssh :) much better,
> flexible and it goes a
> long way in making windows users aware of security.
> greetz, marc
> No offense, but I say we take this tree-hugger,
> shove him out the
> access port, and get the hezmana out of here.
> D'Argo - Bone To Be Wild
> scorpius 2.6.11 #1 Wed Mar 2 16:38:38 CET 2005
> > _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out!
More information about the uClibc