[uClibc] Buildroot package placement policy/style question...
Thomas Cameron
tom at drdabbles.us
Tue Jan 18 22:17:43 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 02:14 pm, George Joseph wrote:
> How should packages that are run on both the build host and target host be
> handled? I'm thinking about packages like mtd where you need mkfs.jffs2 to
> run on the build host to create a fs, but also want the same set of tools
> compiled to run on the target host.
>
> Right now, cramfs, genext2fs, mtd and squashfs all get built in the
> build_(armeb in my case) directory even though they're compiled to run on
> the local host. Maybe they should be moved to toolchain/toolchain_build?
> This way you could have versions compiled for the target in build_ where
> they belong without conflicting with the versions needed for the build
> process.
>
> Thoughts?
I'm in complete agreement. Anybody have a good reason NOT to do this?
--
Tom Cameron
tom<at>drdabbles<dot>us
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20050118/4cfc918f/attachment-0002.pgp
More information about the uClibc
mailing list