Functions not really "compliant"

Rob uclibc at paypc.com
Fri Dec 30 04:33:35 UTC 2005


> Should we try to get these tests pass on uClibc, so we don't end up w/
> static versions compiled in?

I know I'm being lazy, but do these tests fail because uClibc's versions of
these functions are out of date, or is it due to the changes to bring them
into uClibc to begin with?

Assuming it doesn't de-stabilise the library, all things being equal, I'd say
it would be a good idea to bring them into line so they could be used without
needing "local package" overrides.

=R=



More information about the uClibc mailing list