fnmatch/regex in uClibc

Peter S. Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Sat Dec 24 00:26:54 UTC 2005


On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:40:24PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:37:07AM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > > > Should I add it (as regex) with option to use old version?
> > > > > 
> > > > > i would make fnmatch a suboption of new regex and not bother with old
> > > > > regex
> > > > 
> > > > Why suboption of regex? they are not really dependant..
> > > 
> > > your original e-mail made it sound like they were
> > 
> > I have meant only how I added the new regex code, having old and new, they 
> > are really unrelated
> 
> oh, so we'd have a fnmatch and fnmatch_old
> 
> seems like a sane way to move forward to me ... also, fnmatch() isnt
> currently an option under 'Big and Tall' ... seems like we should add
> one eh ?
> -mike

Added option for it, both old and new are within Big and Tall

Peter

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2




More information about the uClibc mailing list