[uClibc] build gcc with uClibc

[Rich DAddio]

Yep. This was a successful short-term measure for us. 

I should have mentioned that we are migrating to
buildroot as well.

Thanks,

Rich D

--- Manuel Novoa III <mjn3 at codepoet.org> wrote:

> This is essentially how the old gcc wrapper worked. 
> It works for some
> things, but breaks down for others.  That's why we
> dropped support for
> it several releases back.  Search the list for
> details.
> 
> Manuel
> 
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:32:49PM -0700, Rich
> DAddio wrote:
> > I have gotten something similar to this to work
> and
> > run with PPC as well. 
> > 
> > Rich D
> > 
> > --- Bahman Rafatjoo <bahmanrafatjoo at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I may be completely off the mark here but I
> built
> > > gcc
> > > for the m68k-elf target and had it installed in
> > > /opt/embedded (./configure
> --prefix=/opt/embedded
> > > --target=m68k-elf).
> > > 
> > > I then built uClibc and had it installed in
> > > /opt/embedded/m68k-elf which is one of the
> places
> > > gcc
> > > looks in for libraries. It **looks** to be OK
> > > because
> > > I compiled and linked a 'hello world' program
> which
> > > did not link properly before. As to whether it
> > > actually runs or not, I haven't tested yet!
> > > 
> > > As a side, I found where to put the libs by
> running
> > > gcc with the -v option during linking. It prints
> out
> > > the parameters it passes to ld and you can work
> out
> > > where your libs should be.
> > > 
> > > HTH!
> > > 
> > > Bahman
> > > 
> > > --- Steven Geerts <Steven.geerts at thomson.net>
> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Buildroot isn't actually the thing that I
> want.  I
> > > > want to have my own
> > > > toolchain setup with all the options that we
> > > > specify.  
> > > > My toolchain is already built with newlib for
> an
> > > > arm11 and it is
> > > > working.
> > > > Actually why I want to use uclibc is because
> > > busybox
> > > > won't build with
> > > > newlib libraries. :-(.  
> > > > I've been looking form information about gcc
> with
> > > > uclibc and I always
> > > > get to the buildroot option, which I don't
> want.
> > > > 
> > > > Isn't there any option, just like newlib,
> where I
> > > > can just say build gcc
> > > > with uclibc????
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 		
> > > __________________________________ 
> > > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > > Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new
> enhanced
> > > search. 
> > > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > uClibc mailing list
> > > uClibc at uclibc.org
> > > http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home
> page 
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
> >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > uClibc mailing list
> > uClibc at uclibc.org
> > http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 



		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs