[uClibc] ld.so loading "false" libs

Peter S. Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Tue Sep 28 20:11:12 UTC 2004


On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> 
> I'll do the above
> 
> > 
> >     *) At present, LDSO_CONF and LDSO_CACHE use the same names
> > 	and same structure as glibc.  This precludes
> > 	LDSO_CACHE_SUPPORT being uses in any sane fashion on a
> > 	dial glibc and uClibc system.  Just as it was necessary
> > 	for use to use a different name for 'libuClibc' rather
> > 	than 'libc', and 'ld-uClibc.so.0' rather than
> > 	'ld-linux.so.2' it seems that these configuration files
> > 	really ought to be given different names.
>
> What names would be fine (I think ld.so.preload should change too):
> ld.uclibc.[conf,cache,preload]
> or
> ld-uClibc.so.[conf,cache,preload]
> or
> lduc.so.[conf,cache,preload]
> 
> I came across
> #ifdef DEBUG
> LDSO_CONF ../util/ld.so.conf
> #else
> LDSO_CONF UCLIBC_RUNTIME_PREFIX ld.so.conf
> #endif
> 
> Is this in use?
> If yes should the path for DEBUG not be ../../utils/ld.so.conf?

What should happen for the case ld-linux.so.2 is used? Should the names 
remain?

Peter

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2


____________________________________________________________________
Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu



More information about the uClibc mailing list