[uClibc] Re: The naming wars continue...
Joakim Tjernlund
Joakim.Tjernlund at lumentis.se
Thu Oct 28 16:44:01 UTC 2004
> > > > using this occation for a reminder - as soon as uclibc would get
> > > > an explicit runtime loader, like glibc has,
> > > > it will be possible to seamlessly run an application,
> > > > with an arbitrary collection of libraries, without collisions,
> > > > via a simple wrapper.
> > > > You could do things which you can't with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
> > > >
> > > > Please consider the useful design features...
> > >
> > > For the record: this would (and it did for me) break horribly
> > > with uc-programs exec-ing glibc ones.
> > >
> > > uc-Midnight Commander was working okay but couldn't run even a
> > > /bin/sh.
> > >
> > > I ended up patching ld-uClibc-0.9.26.so:
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > You could make "/lib:/usr/lib" a config option to uClibc. Glibc has
> > something similar, SYSTEM_DIRS if I recall correctly.
> > Then you could also control the usage of "/usr/X11R6/lib" in uClibc.
>
> Good idea.
>
> btw I don't need to handle /usr/X11R6/lib, every file from there is
> symlinked into /usr/lib. Just say "no" to special cases like this.
I know, but that was not my call.
Jocke
More information about the uClibc
mailing list