[uClibc] sigprocmask issue
Peter S. Mazinger
ps.m at gmx.net
Fri Oct 22 06:45:32 UTC 2004
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Fri Oct 22, 2004 at 08:01:11AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > is
> >
> > #undef sigprocmask
> >
> > at the beginning of sigprocmask.c intended to disable all the arch
> > specific versions (e1/microblaze/sh/v850)?
>
> No. It was intended to avoid a problem where there might
> be a
> #define sigprocmask <blah>
> that would cause us grief, similar to what was done in
> uClibc/libc/signal/sigsetops.h.
>
> I don't see any such defines, but I no doubt added it quite
> some time ago, back when signal handling did not yet work,
>
> -Erik
Will then the arch specific sigprocmask take precedence over the one in
common?
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
More information about the uClibc
mailing list