[uClibc] sigprocmask issue
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Fri Oct 22 06:29:17 UTC 2004
On Fri Oct 22, 2004 at 08:01:11AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> Hello!
>
> is
>
> #undef sigprocmask
>
> at the beginning of sigprocmask.c intended to disable all the arch
> specific versions (e1/microblaze/sh/v850)?
No. It was intended to avoid a problem where there might
be a
#define sigprocmask <blah>
that would cause us grief, similar to what was done in
uClibc/libc/signal/sigsetops.h.
I don't see any such defines, but I no doubt added it quite
some time ago, back when signal handling did not yet work,
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list