[uClibc] sigprocmask issue

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Fri Oct 22 06:29:17 UTC 2004


On Fri Oct 22, 2004 at 08:01:11AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> is
> 
> #undef sigprocmask
> 
> at the beginning of sigprocmask.c intended to disable all the arch 
> specific versions (e1/microblaze/sh/v850)?

No.  It was intended to avoid a problem where there might
be a
    #define sigprocmask <blah>
that would cause us grief, similar to what was done in
uClibc/libc/signal/sigsetops.h.

I don't see any such defines, but I no doubt added it quite
some time ago, back when signal handling did not yet work,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list