[uClibc] unresolved dependency on "pow()" in libfetish.a (coreutils)

Robert Urban urban at UNIX-Beratung.de
Sat May 29 13:57:23 UTC 2004


Manuel wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:23:17AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to substitute openssl-0.9.7d for 0.9.7c?  Can I
> > reasonably expect things to work afterwards?
> 
> What are you talking about?  If you're talking about buildroot, then

yes, buildroot.

> build/openssl.mk is already using openssl-0.9.7d.

I have been using the buildroot tarball.  I'm now paying more
attention to the CVS repository.

thanks,

Rob Urban




More information about the uClibc mailing list