[uClibc] unresolved dependency on "pow()" in libfetish.a (coreutils)
Robert Urban
urban at UNIX-Beratung.de
Sat May 29 13:57:23 UTC 2004
Manuel wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:23:17AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to substitute openssl-0.9.7d for 0.9.7c? Can I
> > reasonably expect things to work afterwards?
>
> What are you talking about? If you're talking about buildroot, then
yes, buildroot.
> build/openssl.mk is already using openssl-0.9.7d.
I have been using the buildroot tarball. I'm now paying more
attention to the CVS repository.
thanks,
Rob Urban
More information about the uClibc
mailing list