[uClibc] llseek or _llseek?

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Thu Dec 16 16:28:42 UTC 2004

On Thu Dec 16, 2004 at 03:49:31PM +0100, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> What's the correct way of calling llseek/_llseek?
> The manpage I have indicates _llseek and thats what the version of
> util-linux
> I tried use as well so compiling for uClibc fails.
> Would the following patch fix it or is it the apps that needs fixing?

I wish I could say the apps need fixing, esp since _llseek is
not at all portable, but there is clearly a history of usage
so a _llseek weak_alias is clearly in order.  Patch applied,


Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

More information about the uClibc mailing list