[uClibc] Re: uclibc and heap randomisation (ET_EXEC)

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Aug 31 23:29:47 UTC 2004

On Tuesday 31 August 2004 06:46 pm, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > it also silently killed Gentoo's sandbox ... there is the fact that our
> > current sandbox implementation is an ugly beast, but there is also the
> > fact that it works fine with this code ...
> hmm, is it working with current CVS where __curbrk is gone but __environ is
> still in there?

yes, my e-mail was delayed because i broke a ssh tunnel ;)

removing the environ stuff breaks procps/portage but the brk stuff does not 
seem to affect it
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 838 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20040831/321fab76/attachment-0002.pgp 

More information about the uClibc mailing list