[uClibc] Re: uclibc and heap randomisation (ET_EXEC)

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Mon Aug 30 17:41:38 UTC 2004

On Monday 30 August 2004 11:44 am, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Hmm, I removed that code by mistake and that broke procps.

it also silently killed Gentoo's sandbox ... there is the fact that our 
current sandbox implementation is an ugly beast, but there is also the fact 
that it works fine with this code ...

theres also the question of what else broke and no one noticed :)  that bit of 
code seems to provide something vital; but what exactly ?  i have no idea 
because these details are way above my head :)

More information about the uClibc mailing list