[uClibc] Re: uclibc and heap randomisation (ET_EXEC)
andersen at codepoet.org
Tue Aug 31 20:29:09 UTC 2004
On Tue Aug 31, 2004 at 10:16:17PM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > Don't know, but since Eric just removed the __curbrk stuff from ldso we
> > will soon find out :)
> > I still not sure that SPARC and ARM's brk() will work as expected, can you
> > test?
> SPARC is probably not possible at the moment.
Does that mean we need to restore the __curbrk stuff into
ldso for sparc only?
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc