[uClibc] kdrive(TinyX)+uclibc

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Thu Aug 19 23:20:15 UTC 2004

On Thursday 19 August 2004 07:10 pm, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> >>http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/testing/
> >
> > And there was much rejoicing!
> Having never used dropbear, and being very happy/comfortable with
> OpenSSH, I'm wondering if there's much of an advantage for me... the
> boxes I'm building for will have 256MB of CompactFlash storage and 128MB
> of RAM to run in, so I can't see that there'd be much point in trying to
> save a few megabytes of storage (and even less RAM) going with dropbear.
> Is there any other reason to use dropbear?

why are you using uclibc then ?  couldnt you argue with glibc in this 
case ? ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 838 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/uclibc/attachments/20040819/7d107fdd/attachment-0002.pgp 

More information about the uClibc mailing list