[uClibc] uclibc for the desktop

[Rogelio M.Serrano Jr.]

On 2003-11-05 00:45:19 +0800 Jeffrey Baitis <baitisj at evolution.com> 
wrote:

> Speed.
> 
> We just completed some preliminary benchmarks of our application and
> discovered that some functions execute much slower under uClibc than
> they do when compiled against glibc. Note that there is often a
> performance penalty associated with "small." :)
> 
> I am currently working to refine our tests to run on multiple 
> platforms,
> and I will make results available assuming there is interest...
> 
> -Jeff

Thats great! Which functions are those? Size is not a requirement but
simplicity is. How did you do the benchmarks? I planning to do the same
thing when i get GNUstep up and running.

> 
> 
> In Tue, 2003-11-04 at 05:05, Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. wrote:
>> I am using uclibc 0.9.21 on my desktop. although it is mainly 
>> targetted for 
>> embedded systems i think it is a good replacement for glibc 
>> specially for 
>> non linux fshs compliant systems. what needs to be added to make 
>> uclibc 
>> good enough for non embedded systems?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc mailing list
>> uClibc at uclibc.org
>> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>