[uClibc]Re: buildroot with glibc?

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Sat Mar 15 19:17:17 UTC 2003

On Sat Mar 15, 2003 at 10:52:50AM -0800, David Wuertele wrote:
> Me> I really like this buildroot system.  Thanks again!  I was
> Me> thinking it would be nice to be able to quickly switch between
> Me> uclibc and glibc systems that were built the same way.  Has anyone
> Me> made a makefile to drop into buildroot for building with glibc?
> Steven> BLASPHEMER!!!! :)
> But gosh, wouldn't you like to show your boss two nand images, one
> that is huge and one that is tiny, and say "see how much money I'm
> saving you on embedded nand flash capacity by choosing this more risky
> libc?"

Feel free to implement it.  It really isn't very hard.

> If I could just save 30% on NAND usage, I would be a hero.
> Unfortunately, that is hard to justify right now because a critical
> module won't even insmod.

Because as we have mentioned several times, it appears your 
huge C++ module is dynamically linked againt libgcc,


Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

More information about the uClibc mailing list