[uClibc]mips and __UCLIBC_CTOR_DTOR__
Mile.Davidovic at micronasnit.com
Thu Mar 6 14:28:18 UTC 2003
Thanks for information.
I would like to make this. If I have success, I will sent you a patch.
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:04:57 -0700
Erik Andersen <andersen at codepoet.org> wrote:
> On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 12:38:23PM +0100, Mile Davidovic wrote:
> > Hi all
> > I notice difference between arm/crt0.S and mips/crt0.S
> > and look like that arm's crt0.s have knowledge about __UCLIBC_CTOR_DTOR__
> > and mips's crt0.S does not know.
> > If I rewrite mips/crt0.S to support __UCLIBC_CTOR_DTOR__, is it
> > only place for doing such thing?
> Right now mips _always_ tries to enable ctor/dtor support. So
> yes, if you follow the example of crt0.S on arm or x86 or superh,
> and modify mips/crt0.S to either call __uClibc_start_main or
> __uClibc_main depending on whether ctors are or are not enabled
> that would be good. Also, if you are going to submit a patch,
> please also include support for PROFILING, per the support now in
> x86 and superh. I was planning to finish that off soon, but if
> you are interested and willing, that is even better,
> Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
> --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc