[uClibc]Can't compile uclibc-0.9.17 on my RH7.3
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Mon Feb 3 22:47:27 UTC 2003
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 04:24:01PM -0500, John Jeffers wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >The easiest and most obvious fix is to disable UCLIBC_HAS_LFS in
> >your .config file, since 2.2.x kernels do not have large file
> >support. But I have gone ahead and added some fixes so it should
> >not compile on 2.2.x kernels even when you have decided to enable
> >the UCLIBC_HAS_LFS option.
>
> Just two dumb questions.
>
> Are we now 2.2 kernels and up or can we still support 2.0.38 kernels? I
> use an old snapshot build base.
It compiles just fine with 2.0.38 kernels also.
> It used to be it was useless to use RH 7.0 and 7.1 so I kept 6.2 because of
> the GCC 2.9X fiasco SuSE kept 2.95 RH 6.2 was 2.95.
>
> Is there a choice between RH7.3, RH8.X and SuSE 8.1 for the cross platform
> now without pain (sounds like there is)?
Any of those should be just fine,
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list