[uClibc]Re: gcc-uClibc botches -nodefaultlibs / -nostdlib
andersen at codepoet.org
Wed Oct 23 05:02:44 UTC 2002
On Wed Oct 23, 2002 at 01:22:49PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Miles Bader <miles at gnu.org> writes:
> > I don't know the semantics that gcc uses for these options (I can look
> > tomorrow if you want), but based on the code in gcc-uClibc, it looks like the
> > intention is that you use `-nostdlib' in the case where you want _nothing_
> > passed to the linker, and `-nodefaultlibs' when you just want to omit the
> > system _libraries_.
> I looked at the gcc docs, and they seem to agree with what I wrote
> above. So can I check my change?
Yes, go ahead.
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc