[uClibc]Busybox and Tinylogin vs uClibc: "segmentation fault"
Stefano Costa
stefano.costa at bluewind.it
Wed Nov 13 11:20:31 UTC 2002
On 13 Nov 2002 at 2:06, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Wed Nov 13, 2002 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Stefano Costa wrote:
> > > What version of the arm-linux kernel are you using?
> > VERSION = 2
> > PATCHLEVEL = 4
> > SUBLEVEL = 6
> > EXTRAVERSION =-rmk1-rayl1
> > This is version 2.4.6 with patch "rmk1" (patches 618-621 I guess) as
> > suggested by Roland Seuhs and others.
>
> Ouch. Any reason you need to use a 1.5 year old kernel? I
> _know_ that busybox + uClibc 0.9.15 + 2.4.19-rmk4 works fine.
Oh, simply because this is the starting point as suggested in the
mentioned web page from Roland Seuhs; I'll now try to upgrade to a
more recent kernel!
>
> > >
> > > What version of gcc and binutils are you using to compile
> > > everything? gcc-3.2? binutils-2.12.1?
> > binutils: 2.11
> > gcc: 2.95.3
> > (I didn't try anything more recent, as all examples and suggestions
> > are based on these versions). Do you recommend trying with gcc-3.2
> > and binutils-2.12.1?
>
> To be honest, I don't have a lot of experience with kernel 2.4.6
> with these versions of binutils and gcc... I generally use much
> newer toolchains, and I've had good experience with gcc-3.2 and
> binutils-2.12.1 on arm.
>
Ok, now I'm upgrading gcc and binutils as well and let you know.
bye-
--
:: Bluewind :: Stefano Costa
:: Embedded Systems Design
www.bluewind.it
Mobile +39 335 6565749
More information about the uClibc
mailing list