[uClibc]Busybox and Tinylogin vs uClibc: "segmentation fault"

Stefano Costa stefano.costa at bluewind.it
Wed Nov 13 11:20:31 UTC 2002


On 13 Nov 2002 at 2:06, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Wed Nov 13, 2002 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Stefano Costa wrote:
> > > What version of the arm-linux kernel are you using?
> > VERSION = 2
> > PATCHLEVEL = 4
> > SUBLEVEL = 6
> > EXTRAVERSION =-rmk1-rayl1
> > This is version 2.4.6 with patch "rmk1" (patches 618-621 I guess) as 
> > suggested by Roland Seuhs and others.
> 
> Ouch.  Any reason you need to use a 1.5 year old kernel?  I
> _know_ that busybox + uClibc 0.9.15 + 2.4.19-rmk4 works fine.

Oh, simply because this is the starting point as suggested in the 
mentioned web page from Roland Seuhs; I'll now try to upgrade to a 
more recent kernel!

> 
> > > 
> > > What version of gcc and binutils are you using to compile
> > > everything?  gcc-3.2?  binutils-2.12.1?
> > binutils: 2.11
> > gcc: 2.95.3
> > (I didn't try anything more recent, as all examples and suggestions 
> > are based on these versions). Do you recommend trying with gcc-3.2 
> > and binutils-2.12.1?
> 
> To be honest, I don't have a lot of experience with kernel 2.4.6
> with these versions of binutils and gcc...  I generally use much
> newer toolchains, and I've had good experience with gcc-3.2 and
> binutils-2.12.1 on arm.
> 

Ok,  now I'm upgrading gcc and binutils as well and let you know.
bye-

--
:: Bluewind :: Stefano Costa
:: Embedded Systems Design
www.bluewind.it
Mobile +39 335 6565749





More information about the uClibc mailing list