[uClibc]Snort, prelude, etc...
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Tue Mar 19 16:19:27 UTC 2002
On Tue Mar 19, 2002 at 10:47:47AM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am wondering what the chances of getting snort and/or prelude to
> compile vs. uClibc are. I understand that I will need to compile all of
> the libraries that they depend on vs. uClibc, but would still like to
> know my chances. I figured prelude would be the easiest, as it has been
> written in C from the ground up. Anyway, I'm going to start working on
> prelude, but please let me know. Thanks!
No idea I'm afraid. Try it and let us know if you have problems,
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list