[uClibc]long long functions in stdlib
Manuel Novoa III
mjn3 at codepoet.org
Tue Jul 9 22:02:38 UTC 2002
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:10:55AM -0400, Beaulieu, James A. wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> When you build without long long support, the two stdlib functions:
> __drand48_iterate()
> srand48_r()
> fail with they operate on the drand48_data structure. This structure
> properly has the long long __a variable removed, but the above functions
> try to operate on __a anyways. There has to be a rework of the functions
> to support the lack of a long long construct.
Yes. I started dealing with "no long long" issues last week and
haven't gotten back to it. I probably won't get to it for a couple
of weeks, as it is stuff I'm doing in my spare time (connected with
my bcc/elks port). There are a number of places that need fixing.
Do you have a pressing need to build without long long support?
Manuel
More information about the uClibc
mailing list