[uClibc]Re: bogus change to gcc-uClibc?

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Mon Feb 25 09:42:49 UTC 2002


On Mon Feb 25, 2002 at 05:57:04PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> I spoke too soon; gcc-uClibc is broken in (at least) two other ways:
> 
>  (1) It uses the `-isystem' option incorrectly for specifying it's
>      system include dirs, and

Yeah, just saw that one too.  fixed now.

>  (2) It doesn't work correctly when linking and also compiling with the
>      same command
>      (e.g. `cc -o foo foo.c', instead of `cc -c foo.c; cc -o foo foo.o')
> 
> The patch below attempts to fix these problems (as well as the issue
> with -Wl, I mentioned in my previous email):

Could you try the latest iteration, and check if it is working
properly for you now?  I _think_ I have taught it to behave
now...

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list