[uClibc]Re: bogus change to gcc-uClibc?
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Mon Feb 25 09:42:49 UTC 2002
On Mon Feb 25, 2002 at 05:57:04PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> I spoke too soon; gcc-uClibc is broken in (at least) two other ways:
>
> (1) It uses the `-isystem' option incorrectly for specifying it's
> system include dirs, and
Yeah, just saw that one too. fixed now.
> (2) It doesn't work correctly when linking and also compiling with the
> same command
> (e.g. `cc -o foo foo.c', instead of `cc -c foo.c; cc -o foo foo.o')
>
> The patch below attempts to fix these problems (as well as the issue
> with -Wl, I mentioned in my previous email):
Could you try the latest iteration, and check if it is working
properly for you now? I _think_ I have taught it to behave
now...
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list