[uClibc]OpenSSL problems on arm-uclibc

[Shane Nay]

This bug appears to be related to your compiler and not uClibc.  I 
have in fact compiled various versions of OpenSSL with arm-uclibc and 
it's worked fine.  (Compiled fine and worked fine after doing so)

The compiler that I use is gcc 2.95.2.  You may want to think about 
trying to lower the optimization level before flushing your toolchain 
though.  Like say..., compile that file by hand with no -O3 flag and 
see what happens.  I think I used -O2 on openssl last time and that 
worked file.

If lower the optimization level doesn't work, go backwards on the 
openssl version, I've used 0.9.3 for sure, and a more recent one, 
either 0.9.6b or a.  If that doesn't work..., then compile up a new 
compiler, it's not that difficult.

Thanks,
Shane Nay.

On Thursday 07 February 2002 20:58, ken restivo wrote:
> I am trying to crosscompile openssl-0.9.6c for an arm-uclibc
> system.
 
> I put the openssl stuff in my buildroot-tux directory.  I manually
> edited the config file to include the results of the various uname
> incantations from my TuxScreen.
 
> Then I did a ./config --prefix=`pwd`/../root no-threads shared
> no-asm
 
> Then:
> make CC=arm-uclibc-gcc LD=arm-uclibc-ld AS=arm-uclibc-as
> 
> All goes well, until I get the following:
> 
> arm-uclibc-gcc -I.. -I../../include -fPIC -DDSO_DLFCN
> -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DNO_ASM -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3
> -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall   -c -o pem_lib.o pem_lib.c
 pem_lib.c:
> In function `PEM_ASN1_write_bio':
> pem_lib.c:410: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 1093 1090 1089 (set (reg:QI 12 ip)
>         (mem:QI (plus:SI (reg:SI 5 r5)
>                 (const_int 1264 [0x4f0])) 0)) -1 (nil)
>     (nil))
> 
> A nihlist compiler, eh? ;-)
> 
> My toolchain is the "jacques"(ipaq) toolchain:
> arm-uclibc-gcc --version
> 2.95.4
> arm-uclibc-as --version
> GNU assembler 2.11.92.0.10
> 
> I'm sorry to just abandon this problem here, but I have never seen
> an insn error from a compile before, can't seem to figure out
> exactly what missing/unimplemented instruction it is complaining
> about, and am pretty sure the problem is something over my head.
 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> -ken
> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc