[uClibc]Re: _obstack_begin

[Erik Andersen]

On Sat Dec 14, 2002 at 02:15:31PM +0100, Claus Rosenberger wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, but the question was is it actually compatible or not. I beat
> >> you know the answer! :-)
> >
> > It should be...  But I havn't tested it and I make no guarantees.
> 
> 
> sorry it doesn't. there are missing some functions for the fileutils (a
> lot of names have _64 in it). i think we must check every package.

I see you forgot to enable large file support in uClibc....  :-)

> >> BTW, could you please include in your uClibc release announces the
> >> information about does the new version actually compatible with the
> >> previous, or not.
> >
> > Nope.  That will just encourage the wrong sorts of things.
> > Sometime soon I hope to start a stable series, and the stable
> > series should always remain compatible with itself...  But that
> > is for some time in the future.
> >
> 
> but there can be an information about changed or removed functions. new
> features doesn't do anything with old binaries.

I'll do my best....

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--