[uClibc]Re: concerning getcwd() on /coda
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Sun Oct 28 08:28:51 UTC 2001
On Fri Oct 26, 2001 at 11:24:21AM +0200, Ivan Popov wrote:
> Hello Erik,
>
> I just want to be sure you haven't missed my mail (below).
>
> As I consider the library behaviour a bug, I think you are interested to
> be well informed. (at least because of coda fs being available for
> embedded linux :)
>
> You don't have to reply to this letter, but I am a bit surprised you
> didn't comment the issue on the mailing list nor to me.
>
> uClibc is a great work,
> keep in on.
Yeah, I think I missed you original patch somehow. Sorry about
that. So on coda, the inode is some funky non-32bit size?
Hmm. As I think about it, what we _really_ should do is use the
__NR_getcwd syscall if it is available, then fall back on the
slow method iff the __NR_getcwd syscall is not available or
fails.
Would you mind adjusting your patch to include that bit?
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list