[uClibc]web browser on uClinux

[AVENARD,JEAN-YVES (HP-Australia,ex2)]

Hi Erik.

I did have a look at Links previously, but it's in C++ and therefore doesn't
like much uClibc (uncompatible headers)

Or maybe I've missed something.

What is nice with w3m, is that it can read frames (convert them into
tables).

Jean-Yves

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Andersen [mailto:andersen at lineo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:56 PM
To: AVENARD,JEAN-YVES (HP-Australia,ex2)
Cc: uclinux-dev at uclinux.org; uclibc at uclibc.org
Subject: Re: [uClibc]web browser on uClinux


On Tue May 08, 2001 at 12:05:45PM +1000, AVENARD,JEAN-YVES
(HP-Australia,ex2) wrote:
> Dear all.
> 
> A while ago I posted a message regarding information on how to get a web
> browser (text only) up and running on uClinux (SH plateform)
> 
> Somebody kindly enough pointed me to this web site:
> http://ei5nazha.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp/~aito/w3m/eng/
> 
> However, despite many tries, I've been unable to compile it for uClinx and
> against uClibc. The problem comes from the GC library included in the
source
> code. I don't know what the GC library is exactly for, but if there's
> anybody out there who has succesfully compiled this web browser with
uClibc
> for uClinux I would be very interested in sharing his experience.
> 
> It looks like a great browser, I personnally find it more intuitive than
> lynx and very easy to use (the cursor thing is fantastic)

have you looked at "links"
    http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/vyplody/links/
?  It is similar to "lynx", but it renders things properly
and sucks much less.  I prefer it to w3m since I find its
UI much more agreeable,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--