[uClibc]clone system call?

[Shane Nay]

On Tuesday 26 June 2001 11:46, Manuel Novoa III wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:15:15AM -0700, Steve Thayer wrote:
> > Is anybody working on this?  I tried putting clone.S back into
>
> Looks like your it.  ;-)
>
> Personally, I don't need thread support in uClibc.  I wonder how many
> people do?

I wonder how many people need sigsetjump..., oh, wait, I needed it the other 
day with ash.  Anyway, threads are certainly a better thing to use on a small 
device since they can share memory between them more easily than say two 
seperate processes.  What I'm driving at is..., you don't need them, 
established, but if someone should come up with an implementation, I think it 
should be accepted.  (Or do like glibc..., unpackage your good old 
linuxthreads and --enable them, that seems pretty reasonable)  Though I'm 
totally being a bit hypocritcal as I made the same argument when someone 
asked me to fix the threads in glibc2.0.7 for mips :).

Thanks,
Shane Nay.