[Bug 1507] [PATCH] ldd segfault fix
bugzilla at busybox.net
bugzilla at busybox.net
Fri May 21 11:36:17 UTC 2010
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1507
--- Comment #5 from Natanael Copa <natanael.copa at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> }
> }
> - if (newlib == NULL)
> + if (newlib == NULL) {
> newlib = malloc(sizeof(struct library));
> + if (newlib)
> + newlib->next = NULL;
> + }
>
> >>> why this one ? why do you need to initialise the next field...
> >>> if !newlib, we returns NULL anyway, so does it matter to set next ?
> >>> is this change actually required to fix the segfault you have seen ?
> >>> it seems not
Good question. I don't remember. I think you are right. probably not needed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the uClibc-cvs
mailing list